By FAUSTINE KAPAMA-Dar es Salaam, just back from Cape Town
The African Judicial
Exchange Network Roundtable, which was organized by CEELI Institute at Pullman
Hotel City Centre in Cape Town, South Africa, was concluded yesterday dated
September 17, 2026.
Such roundtable brought participants
from Tanzania, Ghana, North Macedonia and Namibia, Uganda, Gambia, The
Netherlands, Malawi, Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria, France, Czech Republic, United
States of America and the host country, South Africa.
The participants
described the roundtable as successful, as the topics presented contains important
matters enabling them to understand the proper person, who is supposed tom
speak for the Judiciary.
They could not prefer the
Chief Justice to be in a fore front to avoid embarrassments as happened in one
case, where the Head of the Judiciary issued a statement concerning demonstration,
which was later misinterpreted. The Chief Justice had to come back to the media
to clarify what he meant.
Before the conclusion of
the three-day roundtable, which started on September 15, 2026, the participants
were take through Artificial Intelligence (AI) in judicial communication and
digitalization.
During the session, District
Judge from United States, Hon. John Tunheim talked about Federal Judicial
Centre’s AI toolkit and Judge from Poland, Hon. Greg Borkowski explained about
European Judicial Training Strategy 2025-2023.
On her part, Advocate
Lynn Coleridge from South Africa explained about perspectives on AI from a
judicial training institute.
Thereafter, the
participants were taken through plans for dissemination of the guidelines, next
year activities and final remarks were given, before allowing judges to hold
the Africa Judicial Network Core Group Meeting.
During the three-day
conference, the participants were engaged in a cross-regional dialogue on key
challenges facing contemporary judicial systems. They also discussed various
issues relating to judicial communication, independence, rule of law and public
trust.
The roundtable also
touched upon the growing role of digitalization and artificial intelligence in
judicial systems, examining the potential to enhance efficiency while
considering the ethical, legal and regulatory challenges they raise.
In parallel, sessions on
judicial communication explored how courts can effectively with the public,
address complex or sensitive issues and maintain public confidence, including
discussions on the scope and limits of judges’ freedom of expression.








Hakuna maoni:
Chapisha Maoni